NAME

    Future::AsyncAwait - deferred subroutine syntax for futures

SYNOPSIS

       use Future::AsyncAwait;
    
       async sub do_a_thing
       {
          my $first = await do_first_thing();
    
          my $second = await do_second_thing();
    
          return combine_things( $first, $second );
       }
    
       do_a_thing()->get;

DESCRIPTION

    This module provides syntax for deferring and resuming subroutines
    while waiting for Futures to complete. This syntax aims to make code
    that performs asynchronous operations using futures look neater and
    more expressive than simply using then chaining and other techniques on
    the futures themselves. It is also a similar syntax used by a number of
    other languages; notably C# 5, EcmaScript 6, Python 3, Dart. Rust is
    considering adding it.

    The new syntax takes the form of two new keywords, async and await.

 async

    The async keyword should appear just before the sub keyword that
    declares a new function. When present, this marks that the function
    performs its work in a potentially asynchronous fashion. This has two
    effects: it permits the body of the function to use the await
    expression, and it wraps the return value of the function in a Future
    instance.

       async sub myfunc
       {
          return 123;
       }
    
       my $f = myfunc();
       my $result = $f->get;

    This async-declared function always returns a Future instance when
    invoked. The returned future instance will eventually complete when the
    function returns, either by the return keyword or by falling off the
    end; the result of the future will be the return value from the
    function's code. Alternatively, if the function body throws an
    exception, this will cause the returned future to fail.

    If the final expression in the body of the function returns a Future,
    don't forget to await it rather than simply returning it as it is, or
    else this return value will become double-wrapped - almost certainly
    not what you wanted.

       async sub otherfunc { ... }
    
       async sub myfunc
       {
          ...
          return await otherfunc();
       }

 await

    The await keyword forms an expression which takes a Future instance as
    an operand and yields the eventual result of it. Superficially it can
    be thought of similar to invoking the get method on the future.

       my $result = await $f;
    
       my $result = $f->get;

    However, the key difference (and indeed the entire reason for being a
    new syntax keyword) is the behaviour when the future is still pending
    and is not yet complete. Whereas the simple get method would block
    until the future is complete, the await keyword causes its entire
    containing function to become suspended, making it return a new
    (pending) future instance. It waits in this state until the future it
    was waiting on completes, at which point it wakes up and resumes
    execution from the point of the await expression. When the now-resumed
    function eventually finishes (either by returning a value or throwing
    an exception), this value is set as the result of the future it had
    returned earlier.

    await provides scalar context to its controlling expression.

       async sub func {
          # this function is invoked in scalar context
       }
    
       await func();

    Because the await keyword may cause its containing function to suspend
    early, returning a pending future instance, it is only allowed inside
    async-marked subs.

    The converse is not true; just because a function is marked as async
    does not require it to make use of the await expression. It is still
    useful to turn the result of that function into a future, entirely
    without awaiting on any itself.

    Any function that doesn't actually await anything, and just returns
    immediate futures can be neatened by this module too.

    Instead of writing

       sub imm
       {
          ...
          return Future->done( @result );
       }

    you can now simply write

       async sub imm
       {
          ...
          return @result;
       }

    with the added side-benefit that any exceptions thrown by the elided
    code will be turned into an immediate-failed Future rather than making
    the call itself propagate the exception, which is usually what you
    wanted when dealing with futures.

STABILITY WARNING

    This module is still under active development. While it now seems
    relatively stable enough for most use-cases, there may still be a
    number of memory leaks left in it, especially if still-pending futures
    are abandoned.

    While it seems stable enough for small-scale development and
    experimental testing, take care when using this module in production,
    as some growth in memory over time may be observed. Careful use of
    monitoring and periodic restarts of long-running processes may be a
    wise precaution.

    That said, using this module in places like unit-tests and short-term
    scripts does appear to be quite stable, so do try experimenting with it
    in this sort of situation, and let me know what does and doesn't work.

SUPPORTED USES

    Most cases involving awaiting on still-pending futures should work
    fine:

       async sub foo
       {
          my ( $f ) = @_;
    
          BEFORE();
          await $f;
          AFTER();
       }
    
       async sub bar
       {
          my ( $f ) = @_;
    
          return 1 + await( $f ) + 3;
       }
    
       async sub splot
       {
          while( COND ) {
             await func();
          }
       }
    
       async sub wibble
       {
          if( COND ) {
             await func();
          }
       }
    
       async sub wobble
       {
          foreach my $var ( THINGs ) {
             await func();
          }
       }
    
       async sub quux
       {
          my $x = do {
             await func();
          };
       }
    
       async sub splat
       {
          eval {
             await func();
          };
       }

    Plain lexical variables are preserved across an await deferral:

       async sub quux
       {
          my $message = "Hello, world\n";
          await func();
          print $message;
       }

    On perl versions 5.26 and later async sub syntax supports the
    signatures feature if it is enabled:

       use 5.026;
       use feature 'signatures';
    
       async sub quart($x, $y)
       {
          ...
       }

 Cancellation

    Cancelled futures cause a suspended async sub to simply stop running.

       async sub fizz
       {
          await func();
          say "This is never reached";
       }
    
       my $f = fizz();
       $f->cancel;

    Cancellation requests can propagate backwards into the future the async
    sub is currently waiting on.

       async sub floof
       {
          ...
          await $f1;
       }
    
       my $f2 = floof();
    
       $f2->cancel;  # $f1 will be cancelled too

    This behaviour is still more experimental than the rest of the logic.
    The following should be noted:

      * There is currently no way to perform the equivalent of "on_cancel"
      in Future to add a cancellation callback to a future chain.

      * Cancellation propagation is only implemented on Perl version 5.24
      and above. An async sub in an earlier perl version will still stop
      executing if cancelled, but will not propagate the request backwards
      into the future that the async sub is currently waiting on. See
      "TODO".

SUBCLASSING Future

    By default when an async sub returns a result or fails immediately
    before awaiting, it will return a new completed instance of the Future
    class. In order to allow code that wishes to use a different class to
    represent futures the module import method can be passed the name of a
    class to use instead.

       use Future::AsyncAwait future_class => "Subclass::Of::Future";
    
       async sub func { ... }

    This has the usual lexically-scoped effect, applying only to async subs
    defined within the block; others are unaffected.

       use Future::AsyncAwait;
    
       {
          use Future::AsyncAwait future_class => "Different::Future";
          async sub x { ... }
       }
    
       async sub y { ... }  # returns a regular Future

    This will only affect immediate results. If the await keyword has to
    suspend the function and create a new pending future, it will do this
    by using the prototype constructor on the future it itself is waiting
    on, and the usual subclass-respecting semantics of "new" in Future will
    remain in effect there. As such it is not usually necessary to use this
    feature just for wrapping event system modules or other similar
    situations.

    Such an alternative subclass should implement the API documented by
    Future::AsyncAwait::Awaitable.

WITH OTHER MODULES

 Syntax::Keyword::Try

    As of Future::AsyncAwait version 0.10 and Syntax::Keyword::Try version
    0.07, cross-module integration tests assert that basic try/catch blocks
    inside an async sub work correctly, including those that attempt to
    return from inside try.

       use Future::AsyncAwait;
       use Syntax::Keyword::Try;
    
       async sub attempt
       {
          try {
             await func();
             return "success";
          }
          catch {
             return "failed";
          }
       }

 Syntax::Keyword::Dynamically

    As of Future::AsyncAwait version 0.32, cross-module integration tests
    assert that the dynamically correctly works across an await boundary.

       use Future::AsyncAwait;
       use Syntax::Keyword::Dynamically;
    
       our $var;
    
       async sub trial
       {
          dynamically $var = "value";
    
          await func();
    
          say "Var is still $var";
       }

 Object::Pad

    As of Future::AsyncAwait version 0.38 and Object::Pad version 0.15,
    both modules now use XS::Parse::Sublike to parse blocks of code.
    Because of this the two modules can operate together and allow class
    methods to be written as async subs which await expressions:

       use Future::AsyncAwait;
       use Object::Pad;
    
       class Example
       {
          async method perform($block)
          {
             say "$self is performing code";
             await $block->();
             say "code finished";
          }
       }

SEE ALSO

      * "Awaiting The Future" - TPC in Amsterdam 2017

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xf7rStpNaT0 (slides)
      <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13x5l8Rohv_RjWJ0OTvbsWMXKoNEWREZ4GfKHVykqUvc/edit#slide=id.p>

TODO

      * Suspend and resume with some consideration for the savestack; i.e.
      the area used to implement local and similar. While in general local
      support has awkward questions about semantics, there are certain
      situations and cases where internally-implied localisation of
      variables would still be useful and can be supported without the
      semantic ambiguities of generic local.

         our $DEBUG = 0;
      
         async sub quark
         {
            local $DEBUG = 1;
            await func();
         }

      Since foreach loops on non-lexical iterator variables (usually the $_
      global variable) effectively imply a local-like behaviour, these are
      also disallowed.

         async sub splurt
         {
            foreach ( LIST ) {
               await ...
            }
         }

      Some notes on what makes the problem hard can be found at

      https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122793

      * Currently this module requires perl version 5.16 or later.
      Additionally, threaded builds of perl earlier than 5.22 are not
      supported.

      https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=122252

      https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=124351

      * Implement cancel back-propagation for Perl versions earlier than
      5.24. Currently this does not work due to some as-yet-unknown effects
      that installing the back-propagation has, causing future instances to
      be reclaimed too early.

      https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129202

KNOWN BUGS

    This is not a complete list of all known issues, but rather a summary
    of the most notable ones that currently prevent the module from working
    correctly in a variety of situations. For a complete list of known
    bugs, see the RT queue at
    https://rt.cpan.org/Dist/Display.html?Name=Future-AsyncAwait.

      * await inside map or grep blocks does not work. This is due to the
      difficulty of detecting the map or grep context from internal perl
      state at suspend time, sufficient to be able to restore it again when
      resuming.

      https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129748

      As a workaround, consider converting a map expression to the
      equivalent form using push onto an accumulator array with a foreach
      loop:

         my @results = map { await func($_) } ITEMS;

      becomes

         my @results;
         foreach my $item ( ITEMS ) {
            push @results, await func($item);
         }

      with a similar transformation for grep expressions.

      Alternatively, consider using the fmap* family of functions from
      Future::Utils to provide a concurrent version of the same code, which
      can keep multiple items running concurrently:

         use Future::Utils qw( fmap );
      
         my @results = await fmap { func( shift ) }
            foreach    => [ ITEMS ],
            concurrent => 5;

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    With thanks to Zefram, ilmari and others from irc.perl.org/#p5p for
    assisting with trickier bits of XS logic.

    Thanks to genio for project management and actually reminding me to
    write some code.

    Thanks to The Perl Foundation for sponsoring me to continue working on
    the implementation.

AUTHOR

    Paul Evans <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk>