NAME Test::GlassBox::Heavy - Non-invasive testing of subroutines within Perl programs VERSION This document refers to version 1.03 of Test::GlassBox::Heavy SYNOPSIS use Test::GlassBox::Heavy qw(load_subs); # set up any globals to match those in your Perl program my $global = 'foo'; load_subs( $perl_program_file ); # subs from $perl_program_file are now available for calling directly # OR load_subs( $perl_program_file, $namespace ); # subs from $perl_program_file are now available for calling in $namespace PURPOSE You have a (possibly ancient) Perl program for which you'd like to write some unit tests. The program code cannot be modified to accommodate this, and you want to test subroutines but not actually *run* the program. This module takes away the pain of setting up an environment for this, so you can run the subroutines in (relative) safety. DESCRIPTION If you have a Perl program to test, one approach is to run the program with various command line options and environment settings and observe the output. This might be called *black box testing* because you're treating the program as an opaque blob. Some time later you need to refactor a part of the program, so you want to move on and begin unit testing the subroutines in the program. This is tricky to do without accidentally running the program itself. At this point you're *glass box testing* because you can inspect the internals of the program, although you're not actually changing them. This module takes a rather heavyweight approach to the above using some of Perl's deep magic, such as the "Devel::" and "B::" namespace modules. It stops the Perl program from being run, but allows you to call any subroutine defined in the program. Essentially it turns the program into a package. You'll need to set-up any environment the subroutines may need, such as global lexical variables, and also be aware that side effects from the subroutines will still occur (e.g. database updates). USAGE Load the module like so: use Test::GlassBox::Heavy qw(load_subs); Then use "load_subs()" to inspect your program and make available the subroutines within it. Let's say your program is "/usr/bin/myperlapp". The simplest call exports the program's subroutines into your own namespace so you can call them directly: load_subs( '/usr/bin/myperlapp' ); # and then... $retval = &myperlapp_sub($a,$b); If the subroutines happen to use global lexicals in the program, then you do need to set these up in your own namespace, otherwise "load_subs()" will croak with an error message. Note that they must be lexicals - i.e. using "my". If you don't want your own namespace polluted, then load the subroutines into another namespace: load_subs( '/usr/bin/myperlapp', 'MyTestNamespace' ); # and then... $retval = &MyTestNamespace::myperlapp_sub($a,$b); Note that this namespace must not be nested, in other words it cannot contain the "::" characters. This is a simple limitation which could be patched. Catching "exit()" and other such calls There's the potential for a subroutine to call "exit()", which would seriously cramp the style of your unit tests. All is not lost, as by default this module installs a hook which turns "exit()" into "die()", and in turn "die()" can be caught by an "eval" as part of your test. You can override the hook by passing a HASH reference as the third argument to "load_subs", like so: load_subs( '/usr/bin/myperlapp', 'Other::Place', { exit => sub { $_[0] ||= 0; die "caught exit($_[0])\n" } } ); In fact the example above is the default hook - it dies with that message. Pass a subroutine reference as shown above and you can get "exit()" to do whatever you like. With the default hook, you might have this in your tests: # unit test eval { &Other::Place::sub_which_exits($a,$b) }; is( $@, 'caught exit(0)', 'subroutine exit!' ); If you want to use the hook mechanism but still have the subroutines loaded into your own namespace, then pass a false value as the second argument to "load_subs": load_subs( '/usr/bin/myperlapp', undef, { ... } ); Finally, a similar facility to that described here for overriding "exit()" is available for the "system()" builtin as well. The default hook for "system()" is a noop though - it just allows the call to "system()" to go ahead. CAVEATS * You have to call the subroutines with leading "&" to placate strict mode. * Warnings of category "closure" are disabled in your loaded program. * You have to create any required global lexicals in your own namespace. BUGS Oh, there are probably plenty. I was asked to hack this up for a colleague's project, and I've not tested it thoroughly. The module certainly uses other modules which have grave warnings about treading on Perl's toes with all this deep magic. SEE ALSO Code::Splice There's another way to do this - much simpler and without needing the deep magic modules. "batman" from IRC put this together, here: . There are pros and cons to both methods. REQUIREMENTS Other than the standard contents of the Perl distribution, you will need: Devel::LexAlias PadWalker Devel::Symdump File::Slurp AUTHOR Oliver Gorwits "" ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Some folks on IRC were particularly helpful with suggestions: "batman", "mst" and "tomboh". Thanks, guys! COPYRIGHT & LICENSE Copyright (c) The University of Oxford 2008. This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.