FSF Seminar
GPL
Compliance Case Studies and Legal Ethics in Free Software Licensing
Columbia
Law School, Columbia University
New York, NY
January 21, 2004 (9:00 am - 6:00 pm)
This one-day course presents the details of five different GPL
compliance cases handled by FSF's GPL Compliance Laboratory. Each case
offers unique insights into problems that can arise when the terms of
GPL are not properly followed, and how diplomatic negotiation between
the violator and the copyright holder can yield positive results for
both parties.
This course also includes a unit on the ethical considerations for
attorneys who want to represent clients that make use of or sell Free
Software products.
Prerequisites:
Attendees should have successfully completed the course, a Detailed Study and Analysis of GPL and LGPL,
as the material from that course forms the building blocks for this
material, or have attended a previous Free
Software Licensing and the GNU GPL Seminar.
Audience: The course is of most
interest to lawyers who have clients or employers that deal with Free
Software on a regular basis. However, technical managers and executives
whose businesses use or distribute Free Software will also find the
course very helpful.
The course will include the topics
listed below, along with ample time for questions and discussions.
Lunchtime Speaker: Eben Moglen will be the
lunchtime speaker. Professor Moglen is Professor of Law and Legal
History at Columbia Law School and one of the nation's foremost scholars
on copyright, patents and the proposed "Broadcast Flag". He is also a
member of FSF's Board of Directors and the foundation's General Counsel.
Professor Moglen has also written extensively on the SCO vs IBM lawsuit.
GPL Compliance Case Studies:
* Overview of FSF's
GPL Compliance Lab
We present a brief
introduction to the work that FSF does to enforce the GPL and defend the
freedoms granted by Free Software.
* GPL Violation Case
Study A
In this case study, we consider one of
the most complex and longest-running violations that FSF has handled.
Company A distributed a derivative work of the GNU Complier Collection
(GCC) without complete corresponding source, and refused to distribute
any source at all to anyone who was not their direct customer. We
follow the slow movement toward compliance and explain how FSF deals
with sometimes belligerent violators.
* GPL Violation Case Study B
In this case study, we consider a
contrasting violation to Case A. Company B, who sold a complete
GNU/Linux distribution, had worked hard to be in compliance, but we had
nevertheless found an infraction in their compliance efforts. We
explain how smoothly violations of this type can be resolved and the
process that an otherwise friendly violator can expect.
* GPL Violation Case Study C
In this case study, we present a
violation where an entire embedded GNU/Linux distribution was included
in a consumer electronic device. We consider the problems faced
regarding kernel modules for device drivers for government-regulated
hardware, and cases where both an upstream provider and a downstream
distributor are in violation on separate matters.
* GPL Violation Case Study D
In this case study,
we consider how to handle the inevitable violations that can occur from
a company that is generally committed to doing Free Software as a
regular part of its business, but -- due to experimentation with new
cutting edge business models, or because of mere oversights -- has
occasional GPL violations or near-violations.
* Good Practices for
GPL Compliance
After discussing the
details of the various archetypes of GPL compliance efforts undertaken
by FSF, we generalize what we have learned to advise on good practices
to build a product from start to finish in compliance with GPL, and how
to build internal policies to assure that your client or company is
never faced with a violation report.
Ethical Considerations for the
Attorney Practicing Free Software
This portion of the
course will focus on ethical issues that may arise for attorneys
counseling clients with respect to free software issues. Many of these
topics have more general application, but specific discussion of the
ways in which these issues may arise for free software clients will be
presented.
* Part I:
Representing Free Software Clients
An attorney's ethical
duties run to not just their clients, but to potential clients and the
general public as well. Pro bono representation of free software
clients not only conforms with the principles set forth by most Bar
Associations, but also provides many other benefits to an attorney. Once
a client is retained, the duty of loyalty attaches and conflicts, be
they direct, indirect, or political, should be identified and handled.
* Part II: Practicing
Free Software
Differing ethical issues arise in the
context of counseling a client who is a free software licensor as
opposed to one who is a free software licensee. Further still,
representing a client who is both licensor and licensee presents a
combination of all of these issues. Compliance investigation and
enforcement strategies must be implemented in accordance with both the
duty of loyalty and the duty of honesty. Likewise, performing exposure
abatement while also defending against charges of infringement may pose
problems within the attorney-client relationship. The ethical
considerations relevant to each of these situations will be presented
and discussed.
* Part III: More General Ethical Considerations Relevant to Free
Software
Free software counseling is but one
specialty within the realm of intellectual property counseling in
general. A review of various topics of more general application, but
with special relevance to free software counseling, will be given along
with a discussion of the reasons why and ways in which such issues arise
when representing free software clients. Patent prosecution and
governing rules considerations are two such topics.
Pricing (Book by December 24, 2003 for early registration discount):
$495 for registrations on or before
December 24, 2003 and $595 after December 24
Financial Aid Policy: Applicants with annual incomes of up to
$15,000 are entitled to a 75% discount. People with incomes between
$15,000 and $30,000 receive a 50% discount. Any member of the
judiciary, academics or attorneys from non-profit organizations receive
a 10% discount. If you fall within one of these categories, please
contact John at johns@fsf.org or
Ravi at ravi@fsf.org or by phone at
617.620.9640.
To register for the seminar, please download the
registration form,
fill it in and fax it to FSF.
CLE
Credits: Attorneys who successfully complete the day long
course will be entitled to a total of 7.5 New York Transitional CLE
credits, 3 in the area of Professional Practice and 4.5 toward the
Ethics and Professionalism requirments.
Companies that have signed up as
Corporate Patrons of FSF receive two complimentary seats per year at FSF
seminars and reduced rates for additional participants. Please contact patron@fsf.org for more details. You
can find out more about the Corporate Patron Program at http://patron.fsf.org.
The seminar will be held at Columbia
Law School in New York. Directions will be sent following registration.
For more information, please contact Ravi Khanna, FSF's Director of
Communication at ravi@fsf.org or by
calling 1+617-620-9640.