Re: plip with mulinux

From: Michele Andreoli (
Date: Tue Aug 29 2000 - 09:43:08 CEST

On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:45:22PM +0200, Dumas Patrice nicely wrote:
> Well, the problem is that there is some common things between all the networking
> stuff, like the definition of the network, the netmask, etc, that could be
> different from interface to interface (mainly localized in manual_config()).
> I also think like you that it would be better to have separated .fun, but maybe
> there could be a sort of "library" for common functions, so that the code isn't
> triplicated (or even more...).
> What do you think about that ?

The solution is to put the network theory in a separated script: netconfig.


I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't 
remember any. Would two negative ones do?       -- Woody Allen
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:15 CET