From: Michele Andreoli (m.andreoli@tin.it)
Date: Thu Jan 04 2001 - 10:19:39 CET
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:16:12AM +0100, Maxim Belooussov nicely wrote:
>
> But the best thing about QT is that you can write apps using QT
> library for both Windows and Unix/Linux, you only choose at
> compilation time what OS you are going to use.
Qt sounds very interesting, but it cost very much!
> What are you going to write for Windows that requires C++ compiler?
> Some serious software? ;)
Mah, simply a sort of setup.exe for muLinux with a GUI, able to unpack
the archives, or also to define minimal customization, etc. I saw
something like in the recent Mandrake, in a demostration in Firenze.
My brother works in a company with a network based on NT: he frequently
changes machines and software, so I can ask him. My PC itself is made up
from recycled components, based upon brother's donations.
My brother consider a PIII with *only* 128M a machine candidate
to garbage, so I often do expiant some ciruitery from my PC in favor
of some new one.
Michele
-- In summing up, I wish I had some kind of affirmative message to leave you with, I don't. Would you take two negative messages? - Woody Allen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mulinux-unsubscribe@sunsite.auc.dk For additional commands, e-mail: mulinux-help@sunsite.auc.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:17 CET