Re: missing memory

From: Stephen Isard (
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 18:36:37 CEST

Thanks for the replies. So the consensus seems to be that what I'm
seeing is normal, but then I don't understand why I can't run mu from an
ordinary boot+root+usr floppy on this machine, and instead have to treat
it as "low memory". I thought mu loaded comfortably in 8Mb. (In fact,
I thought I had run it myself in 8Mb on a different machine.) Or is the
640kB base memory + 7168kB extended memory in this machine a bit less
than what people usually mean by 8Mb?

Stephen Isard

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:22 CET