# Interactome reconstruction from co-elution data with PrInCE

Michael Skinnider1*

1Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

*michael.skinnider@msl.ubc.ca

#### 30 October 2019

#### Abstract

Co-elution proteomics refers to a family of high-throughput methods to map protein-protein interaction networks and their dynamics in cellular stimulation or differentiation. These methods, also referred to as co-migration, co-fractionation, or protein correlation profiling, involve separating interacting protein complexes on the basis of their diameter or biochemical properties. Protein-protein interactions can then be inferred for pairs of proteins with similar elution profiles. PrInCE implements a machine-learning approach to identify protein-protein interactions given a set of labelled examples, using features derived exclusively from the data. This allows PrInCE to infer high-quality protein interaction networks from raw proteomics data, without bias towards known interactions or functionally associated proteins, making PrInCE a unique computational resource for discovery. We provide an overview of the key functionalities of the PrInCE R package, and demonstrate an example of the analysis of data from a co-elution experiment investigating the response of the cytoplasmic interactome to Fas-mediated apoptosis.

#### Package

PrInCE 1.2.0

## 0.1 Introduction: What is PrInCE?

Proteins are the central players of life at the molecular level. Yet cellular functions are rarely accomplished by single proteins acting in isolation. Instead, most biological processes are accomplished by the dynamic organization of proteins and other biological macromolecules, such as RNA and DNA, into networks of physical interactions. Systematic maps of these protein interaction networks can provide a “wiring diagram” to complement the “parts list” revealed by genome sequencing, placing each protein into a functional context. However, historically, protein interaction networks were mapped primarily using labour-intensive methods that involved tagging each protein for affinity purification, or heterologously expressing them in yeast. Besides being labour intensive, these approaches also yielded static pictures of cellular networks that offered little insight into how these networks are rewired by stimulation or in differentiation.

Recently, a family of proteomic approaches, variously referred to as co-elution, co-migration, co-fractionation, or protein correlation profiling, has been developed that allow high-throughput mapping of protein interaction networks in native cellular conditions (1–3). A subset of these even enable investigators to identify dynamic rearrangements in the protein-protein interactome in response to cellular stimulation (1, 4), or across in vivo samples, such as mouse tissues (5). The underlying principle that unifies different experimental protocols is to separate protein complexes into a number of fractions, on the basis of their size (diameter) or biochemical properties, and to perform quantitative proteomic analysis of the fractions. Proteins with similar “profiles” across fractions can be inferred to physically interact. However, because the number of potential pairs grows quadratically with the number of proteins quantified, and the number of potential complexes grows even faster, specialized bioinformatic approaches are required to infer protein interaction networks from the raw proteomics data.

PrInCE is an R package that uses a machine learning approach to infer protein-protein interaction networks at a user-defined level of precision from co-elution proteomics data. The input to PrInCE consists of a matrix derived from a co-elution proteomics experiment, with quantitations for each protein in each fraction (PrInCE can also handle more than one such matrix, in the case of biological replicates). PrInCE also requires a set of ‘gold standard’ protein complexes to learn from. It then calculates a series of features for each possible protein pair; importantly, these are derived directly from the data, without incorporating any external knowledge, a step that minimizes bias towards the rediscovery of known interactions (6). These features, and the accompanying gold standard, are used as input to the classifier, which learns to distinguish interacting and non-interacting pairs. A cross-validation procedure is then used to score every potential protein pair in the dataset, which are then ranked by their score in descending order, and the precision (defined as the ratio of true positives to true positives plus false positives) is calculated at every point in this ranked list. The user can then apply a precision threshold of their choice to this ranked list to infer the protein-protein interaction network from their experiment.

## 0.2 Example 1: Interactome rearrangements in apoptosis

To demonstrate the use of PrInCE, we will work through a small example that is derived from a subset of the data presented in Scott et al., 2017 (4). In this paper, the authors mapped rearrangements in the cytoplasmic and membrane interactome during Fas-mediated apoptosis. Control and stimulated cytoplasmic and membrane interactomes were quantified in three replicates each, meaning the complete dataset consists of twelve replicates. In practice, each set of replicates would be analyzed together (for a total of four networks). However, such a complete analysis of the dataset would take over an hour, so for this vignette we focus on a single replicate. The replicate in question is the first cytoplasmic replicate from the Fas-stimulated condition, and is bundled with the PrInCE package; it can be loaded with the following command:

    library(PrInCE)
    data(scott)

The dataset consists of ratiometric protein quantitations, achieved by SILAC (stable isotope labelling by amino acids in cell culture), for 1,560 proteins in 55 size exclusion chromatography (SEC) fractions:

    dim(scott)

    ## [1] 1560   55

Each protein was quantified in at least one fraction; however, many measurements are missing:

    scott[1:10, 1:5]

    ##            SEC_1 SEC_2 SEC_3  SEC_4  SEC_5
    ## A0AVT1       NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A0MZ66-5     NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A3KN83       NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A5YKK6       NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A6NDG6       NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A6NG79       NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A6NHL2-2     NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A6NHR9       NaN   NaN   NaN 2.5125 1.8817
    ## A6NIH7       NaN   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN
    ## A6NN80   0.22313   NaN   NaN    NaN    NaN

This scenario is common in co-elution data: for example, a protein will be absent entirely from a given SEC fraction if it does not form a complex with a molecular weight in the mass range of that fraction.

To predict protein-protein interactions using PrInCE’s machine-learning approach, we also need two additional pieces of information to train the classifier: a set of true positive interactions, and a set of true negative interactions. In practice, we recommend providing a list of experimentally verified protein complexes: PrInCE assumes intra-complex interactions represent true positives, and inter-complex interactions represent true negatives. These can be obtained from a number of sources, such as the CORUM database (7), or our own previously reported custom subset of CORUM that removes complexes which may not remain intact under co-elution conditions (8). In the PrInCE R package, we provide a third option which is distributed under a CC-BY license, consisting of a list of 477 human protein complexes from the Complex Portal (9).

    data(gold_standard)
    head(gold_standard)

    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/B receptor complex`
    ## [1] "O95264" "P46098"
    ##
    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/C receptor complex`
    ## [1] "P46098" "Q8WXA8"
    ##
    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/D receptor complex`
    ## [1] "P46098" "Q70Z44"
    ##
    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/E receptor complex`
    ## [1] "P46098" "A5X5Y0"
    ##
    ## $`6-phosphofructokinase, M2L2 heterotetramer`
    ## [1] "P08237" "P17858"
    ##
    ## $`ACF complex`
    ## [1] "Q9NRL2" "O60264"

### 0.2.1 Predicting protein-protein interactions: one-step analysis

The main function of the PrInCE package, `PrInCE`, provides an end-to-end workflow for predicting protein-protein interaction networks from the raw co-elution data. Briefly, this function first filters proteins with too little information to permit data analysis, then cleans the profiles for the remaining proteins and fits a mixture of Gaussians to each cleaned profile. PrInCE then calculates six features for each protein pair, from either the raw profiles, the cleaned profiles, or the fitted Gaussian mixture models, and concatenates features across replicates if more than one replicate was used. These features are used as input to a machine learning model, along with the set of ‘gold standard’ true positive and true negative interactions, which uses a ten-fold cross-validation procedure to assign scores to each protein pair. Protein pairs are ranked by their classifier scores and the precision at each point in the ranked list is calculated. The entire list is returned to a user, who can select a precision threshold that matches their needs.

Once we have loaded a co-elution matrix and list of gold standard protein complexes into R, inferring the protein-protein interaction network with PrInCE is therefore as simple as the following command:

    # set the seed to ensure reproducible output
    set.seed(0)
    ## not evaluated
    PrInCE(scott, gold_standard)

However, this command is not evaluated in order to provide some information on a further parameter that the `PrInCE` function takes. One of the six features that PrInCE uses to score protein-protein interactions is derived from fitting a mixture of Gaussians to each protein’s elution profile. The process of Gaussian fitting also allows PrInCE to filter proteins with poor-quality elution profiles (i.e., proteins for which a Gaussian mixture could not be fit with an r2 value above some minimum, set to 0.5 by default). However, the process of fitting Gaussian mixture models to thousands of curves is one of the more computationally intensive steps in PrInCE and consequently, the `PrInCE` function can also take a pre-computed list of fitted Gaussians, fit using the command `build_gaussians`:

    # set the seed to ensure reproducible output
    set.seed(0)
    ## not evaluated
    build_gaussians(scott)

In practice, the ability to provide pre-computed Gaussians can also save time when trying different parameters in PrInCE, such as different types of classifiers (described in greater detail in the following section).

We provide a list of fitted Gaussians for the `scott` dataset in the `scott_gaussians` object:

    data(scott_gaussians)
    str(scott_gaussians[[3]])

    ## List of 5
    ##  $ n_gaussians: int 3
    ##  $ R2         : num 0.95
    ##  $ iterations : num 1
    ##  $ coefs      :List of 3
    ##   ..$ A    : Named num [1:3] 2.9 1.59 1.21
    ##   .. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:3] "A1" "A2" "A3"
    ##   ..$ mu   : Named num [1:3] 16.05 4.91 40.95
    ##   .. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:3] "mu1" "mu2" "mu3"
    ##   ..$ sigma: Named num [1:3] 6.74 3.11 3.32
    ##   .. ..- attr(*, "names")= chr [1:3] "sigma1" "sigma2" "sigma3"
    ##  $ curveFit   : num [1:55] 0.348 0.701 1.161 1.581 1.789 ...

We therefore run PrInCE using our precomputed Gaussian curves with the following command, allowing PrInCE to print information about the status of the analysis (`verbose = TRUE`) and limiting the number of cross-validation folds for the sake of time:

    # set the seed to ensure reproducible output
    set.seed(0)
    # one-step analysis
    interactions <- PrInCE(scott, gold_standard,
                           gaussians = scott_gaussians,
                           cv_folds = 3,
                           verbose = TRUE)

    ## generating features for replicate 1 ...

    ##   fit mixtures of Gaussians to 970 of 1560 profiles

    ## concatenating features across replicates ...

    ## making labels ...

    ## training classifiers ...

    head(interactions, 50)

    ##    protein_A protein_B     score label precision
    ## 1     D3YTB1    P62424 0.9966535    NA       NaN
    ## 2     P40429    P46778 0.9966243    NA       NaN
    ## 3     P36578    P40429 0.9966206    NA       NaN
    ## 4     P13796    Q96KP4 0.9966082    NA       NaN
    ## 5     P36578    P46778 0.9965996    NA       NaN
    ## 6     P13796  P22392-2 0.9965981    NA       NaN
    ## 7     P13639    P27348 0.9965966    NA       NaN
    ## 8     P25786    P28066 0.9965953    NA       NaN
    ## 9     P18124    P46778 0.9965819    NA       NaN
    ## 10    P40429    P62906 0.9965687    NA       NaN
    ## 11    P62258    Q04917 0.9965648    NA       NaN
    ## 12    C9J4Z3    P36578 0.9965556    NA       NaN
    ## 13    D3YTB1    P36578 0.9965554    NA       NaN
    ## 14    P07195    P63104 0.9965506    NA       NaN
    ## 15    E7EPB3    P05388 0.9965472    NA       NaN
    ## 16    P62424    Q9Y3U8 0.9965441    NA       NaN
    ## 17    P26373    P32969 0.9965418    NA       NaN
    ## 18    P36578    P62906 0.9965381    NA       NaN
    ## 19    D3YTB1    P40429 0.9965354    NA       NaN
    ## 20    P49207    P62906 0.9965264    NA       NaN
    ## 21    D3YTB1    P47914 0.9965219    NA       NaN
    ## 22    P46778    P61313 0.9965088    NA       NaN
    ## 23    P18124    P61313 0.9965066    NA       NaN
    ## 24    P24534    P26641 0.9964980    NA       NaN
    ## 25    C9J4Z3    D3YTB1 0.9964938    NA       NaN
    ## 26    P46778    P62906 0.9964911    NA       NaN
    ## 27    P18124    P36578 0.9964753    NA       NaN
    ## 28    P07900    P08238 0.9964662     0       0.0
    ## 29    C9J4Z3    P62424 0.9964569    NA       0.0
    ## 30    C9J4Z3    P40429 0.9964454    NA       0.0
    ## 31    P40227    Q99832 0.9964450    NA       0.0
    ## 32    P54136    Q15046 0.9964393    NA       0.0
    ## 33    E7EPB3    P05387 0.9964292    NA       0.0
    ## 34    P18124    P40429 0.9964271    NA       0.0
    ## 35    P28066    P49720 0.9964230    NA       0.0
    ## 36    P05387    P05388 0.9964228    NA       0.0
    ## 37    P39019    P46783 0.9964171    NA       0.0
    ## 38    P04075    P31946 0.9964159    NA       0.0
    ## 39    P05388    P36578 0.9964155    NA       0.0
    ## 40    P47914    P62913 0.9964140    NA       0.0
    ## 41    D3YTB1    P46778 0.9964131    NA       0.0
    ## 42    P05388    P40429 0.9964052    NA       0.0
    ## 43  P22392-2    Q96KP4 0.9964008    NA       0.0
    ## 44    P08590  P60660-2 0.9963959    NA       0.0
    ## 45    C9J4Z3    P05388 0.9963954    NA       0.0
    ## 46    D3YTB1    P05388 0.9963918    NA       0.0
    ## 47    P12956    P13010 0.9963836     1       0.5
    ## 48    P62841    P15880 0.9963803    NA       0.5
    ## 49    D3YTB1    Q9Y3U8 0.9963766    NA       0.5
    ## 50    P40429    P61313 0.9963514    NA       0.5

The columns in the output are as follows:

- `protein_A`: the identifier of the first protein in the pair;
- `protein_B`: the identifier of the second in the pair;
- `score`: the score assigned to the protein pair by the classifier
- `label`: if the protein pair is in the reference set, this value will be `1` (for true positives) or `0` (for true negatives); for all other pairs, the value is `NA`
- `precision`: the precision at this point in the ranked list

Note that at the very top of the list, the precision is not defined if no true positives and no true negatives have yet been encountered.

In this toy example, the small size of our dataset and the small size of our gold-standard complexes mean that the precision curve is unstable below about 2,000 interactions:

    precision <- interactions$precision[1:10000]
    plot(precision)

In most real examples, the precision curve shows a smoother decline.

For illustrative purposes, we here threshold the network at 50% precision using the `threshold_precision` function:

    network <- threshold_precision(interactions, threshold = 0.5)
    nrow(network)

    ## [1] 9236

This results in an unweighted protein-protein interaction network with 9236 interactions.

### 0.2.2 Predicting protein-protein interactions: step-by-step analysis

The `PrInCE` function accepts a large number of arguments that were omitted from the preceding discussion. We have strived to set reasonable defaults for each of these parameters, based on analyses that have involved much of the human co-elution proteomics data in the public domain. However, users may wish to change some of these defaults, based on the properties of their dataset or the biological questions motivating their investigation. Here, we provide an alternative workflow for analyzing the `scott` dataset in a step-by-step manner, and a discussion of some of the most important parameters.

#### 0.2.2.1 `build_gaussians`

The `build_gaussians` function in PrInCE can be broken down into three steps. First, profiles are preprocessed by basic filtering and cleaning operations. Single missing values are imputed as the mean of their two neighboring points, and profiles with fewer than five consecutive points are filtered from further analysis. Profiles are then cleaned by replacing missing values with near-zero noise, and smoothed with a moving average filter. Finally, mixtures of one to five Gaussians are fit to each profile using nonlinear least squares, and model selection is performed to retain the best mixture model for each curve. Proteins that could not be fit with a mixture of Gaussians without an r2 value above some minimum are omitted.

This function takes the following parameters:

- `min_consecutive`: the minimum number of consecutive points, after imputing single missing values, to retain a profile; defaults to `5`
- `min_points`: the minimum number of total points to retain a profile; defaults to `1` so that only the number of consecutive points is used to filter profiles
- `impute_NA`: if `FALSE`, skip imputation of single missing values
- `smooth`: if `FALSE`, skip curve smoothing with the moving average filter
- `smooth_width`: width of the moving average filter, in fractions; defaults to `4`
- `max_gaussians`: the maximum number of Gaussians with which to fit each profile; defaults to `5`
- `criterion`: the criterion used for model selection; defaults to `AICc`, the corrected Akaike information criterion; other options are `BIC` (Bayesian information criterion) or `AIC` (Akaike information criterion)
- `max_iterations`: the maximum number of iterations to use for curve fitting with random restarts
- `min_R_squared`: the minimum r2 value to retain the fitted curve; defaults to `0.5`. Profiles that cannot be fit by a mixture of Gaussians are assumed to be low-quality and excluded from further analysis by default.
- `method`: method used to select initial conditions for `nls`; can select either random parameters (`random`) or make an educated guess based on the maximum values in the profile (`guess`, the default)
- `filter_gaussians_center`, `filter_gaussians_height`, `filter_gaussians_variance_min`, `filter_gaussians_variance_max`: heuristics used to filter poor-quality Gaussian fits. If `TRUE` (default), `filter_gaussians_center` will remove Gaussians whose mean falls outside the bounds of the chromatogram. `filter_gaussians_height` controls the minimum height of the Gaussians, while `filter_gaussians_variance_min` and `filter_gaussians_variance_max` control the range of their standard deviation.

All of these parameters except the last four are exposed through the `PrInCE` function.

As an example, we will re-analyze the `scott` dataset with stricter filtering criteria, requiring the presence of at least ten (non-imputed) data points in addition to five consecutive points; fitting with a maximum of three Gaussians, instead of five; and requiring a better fit than the default settings. For the sake of time, we allow only 10 iterations for the curve-fitting algorithm here, and we elect to fit only the first 500 profiles.

    data(scott)
    # set the seed to ensure reproducible output
    set.seed(0)
    # fit Gaussians
    gauss <- build_gaussians(scott[seq_len(500), ],
                             min_points = 10, min_consecutive = 5,
                             max_gaussians = 3, min_R_squared = 0.75,
                             max_iterations = 10)

    ## .. fitting Gaussian mixture models to 255 profiles

    # filter profiles that were not fit
    scott <- scott[names(gauss), ]

By default, the profile matrix is filtered to exclude proteins whose elution profiles could not be fit by a mixture of Gaussians prior to featurization.

#### 0.2.2.2 `calculate_features`

Having fitted our co-elution profiles with Gaussians and filtered them accordingly, the next step is to calculate features for each protein pair. This is done using the `calculate_features` function. By default, PrInCE calculates six features from each pair of co-elution profiles as input to the classifier, including conventional similarity metrics but also several features specifically adapted to co-elution proteomics. The complete set of features includes:

1. the Pearson correlation between raw co-elution profiles;
2. the p-value of the Pearson correlation between raw co-elution profiles;
3. the Pearson correlation between cleaned profiles, which are generated by imputing single missing values with the mean of their neighbors, replacing remaining missing values with random near-zero noise, and smoothing the profiles using a moving average filter (see `clean_profile`);
4. the Euclidean distance between cleaned profiles;
5. the ‘co-peak’ score, defined as the distance, in fractions, between the maximum values of each profile; and
6. the ‘co-apex’ score, defined as the minimum Euclidean distance between any pair of fit Gaussians

In addition to the profile matrix and list of fitted Gaussian mixtures, the `calculate_features` function takes six parameters that enable the user to enable or disable each of these six features (in order, `pearson_R_raw`, `pearson_P`, `pearson_R_cleaned`, `euclidean_distance`, `co_peak`, and `co_apex`). By default, all six are enabled.

Continuing our example, if we wanted the classifier to omit the Euclidean distance, we could disable this feature using the following command:

    feat <- calculate_features(scott, gauss, euclidean_distance = FALSE)
    head(feat)

    ##   protein_A protein_B    cor_R_raw cor_R_cleaned       cor_P co_peak
    ## 1    A0AVT1    B3KNT8 1.239943e+00      1.097955 0.504313944      11
    ## 2    A0AVT1    B4DQ14 0.000000e+00      1.120983 1.000000000      43
    ## 3    B3KNT8    B4DQ14 1.264748e+00      1.262210 0.382046523      32
    ## 4    A0AVT1    B4DQJ8 2.851543e-06      1.018199 0.001520321       2
    ## 5    B3KNT8    B4DQJ8 1.045782e+00      1.110313 0.827969878      13
    ## 6    B4DQ14    B4DQJ8 3.928140e-01      1.064420 0.110395487      45
    ##     co_apex
    ## 1 10.405282
    ## 2 41.447201
    ## 3 31.566148
    ## 4  2.714134
    ## 5  7.815383
    ## 6 23.819433

If we had multiple replicates, we would here concatenate them into a single feature data frame using the `concatenate_features` function:

    ## not run
    # concatenate features from three different `scott` replicates
    feat1 <- calculate_features(scott1, gauss1)
    feat2 <- calculate_features(scott2, gauss2)
    feat3 <- calculate_features(scott3, gauss3)
    feat <- concatenate_features(list(feat1, feat2, feat3))

#### 0.2.2.3 `predict_interactions`

With our features in hand and a list of gold standard protein complexes, we can now provide these to a machine-learning classifier to rank potential interactions. This is accomplished using the `predict_interactions` function. In order to score interactions that are also part of the reference set, PrInCE uses a cross-validation strategy, randomly splitting the reference data into ten folds, and using each split to score interactions in one of the folds without including them in the training data. For interactions that are not part of the training set, the median score over all ten folds is returned. In addition, to ensure that the results are not sensitive to the way in which the dataset is split, PrInCE averages predictions over an ensemble of ten classifiers, each with different cross-validation splits. By default, PrInCE uses a naive Bayes classifier. However, the PrInCE R package also implements three other types of classifiers: support vector machine, random forest, and logistic regression. In addition, PrInCE offers an option to ensemble results over multiple different classifiers (sometimes called “heterogeneous classifier fusion” (10)). In this option, cross-validation and ensembling is performed for all four types of classifiers independently, then the ranks of each protein pair across all four classifiers are averaged to return the final ranked list.

These options are controlled using the following parameters:

- `classifier`: the type of classifier to use; one of `NB`, `SVM`, `RF`, `LR`, or `ensemble`, corresponding to the options described above
- `models`: the size of the ensemble for each classifier type, i.e., the number of models to train, each with a different train-test split
- `cv_folds`: the number of folds to use in k-fold cross-validation
- `trees`: for random forest and heterogeneous classifier fusion only, the number of trees in each RF model

Continuing our example, we will demonstrate the use of a support vector machine to rank potential interactions (`classifier = "SVM"`). For the sake of time, we use a single model (omitting ensembling; `models = 1`) and only three-fold cross-validation folds (`cv_folds = 3`). To use our list of protein complexes as a gold standard, we must first convert it to an adjacency matrix; this is done using the helper function `adjacency_matrix_from_list` (see also the related function `adjacency_matrix_from_data_frame`).

    data(gold_standard)
    reference <- adjacency_matrix_from_list(gold_standard)
    # set the seed to ensure reproducible output
    set.seed(0)
    # predict interactions
    ppi <- predict_interactions(feat, reference, classifier = "SVM",
                                models = 1, cv_folds = 3)

We can now plot the precision curve over the first 20,000 interactions:

    precision <- ppi$precision[seq_len(2e4)]
    plot(precision)

Finally, we will likely want to keep only the set of high-confidence interactions for further analysis, where “confidence” is quantified using precision. This is accomplished using the `threshold_precision` function. For example, the following command constructs a protein-protein interaction network at 70% precision:

    net <- threshold_precision(ppi, threshold = 0.7)
    nrow(net)

    ## [1] 4245

### 0.2.3 Identifying co-eluting protein complexes

The core functionality of PrInCE involves the use of a machine-learning framework to predict binary interactions from co-elution data, with discovery of novel interactions being a primary goal. However, PrInCE also implements one alternative to this analytical framework, which asks whether statistically significant co-elution is observed for known protein complexes.
This is achieved using a permutation-based approach, inspired by methods developed for another proteomic method for interactome profiling, thermal proximity co-aggregation (TPCA) (11). Briefly, given a list of known complexes, PrInCE calculates the median Pearson correlation between all pairs of complex members. (To reduce the effect of spurious correlations between proteins that are rarely observed in the same fractions, PrInCE requires a certain minimum number of paired observations to include any given correlation in this analysis—by default, 10 pairs). Then, PrInCE simulates a large number of complexes of equivalent size (by default, 100), and calculates the median Pearson correlation between pairs of random ‘complexes’. The resulting null distribution is used to assess the statistical significance of the observed co-elution profile at the protein complex level.

To identify complexes from the Complex Portal dataset that are significantly co-eluting in this replicate, we first use PrInCE’s `filter_profiles` and `clean_profiles` functions:

    # analyze cleaned profiles
    data(scott)
    filtered = filter_profiles(scott)
    chromatograms = clean_profiles(filtered)

The `filter_profiles` function uses a permissive set of filters to discard chromatograms that do not contain enough information to make inferences about that protein’s interaction partners. Similarly, the `clean_profiles` applies some simple preprocessing steps to the filtered chromatograms. By default, this function is applied to calculate Pearson correlations during interaction prediction in PrInCE. It imputes single missing values as the average of the two neighbors, remaining missing values with near-zero noise, then passes a moving-average filter over the chromatogram to smooth it.

We can now test for complex co-elution in the preprocessed chromatogram matrix using the `detect_complexes` function:

    # detect significantly co-eluting complexes
    set.seed(0)
    z_scores = detect_complexes(chromatograms, gold_standard)

Complexes that could not be tested (that is, with fewer than three complex members present in the elution matrix) are given `NA` values, which we remove.

    # remove complexes that could not be analyzed
    z_scores = na.omit(z_scores)
    # how many could be tested?
    length(z_scores)

    ## [1] 23

    # how many were significant at uncorrected, two-tailed p < 0.05?
    sum(z_scores > 1.96)

    ## [1] 13

    # print the top complexes
    head(sort(z_scores, decreasing = TRUE))

    ##                                                      COP9 signalosome variant 1
    ##                                                                        9.083072
    ##                                                      COP9 signalosome variant 2
    ##                                                                        6.744865
    ##                                             CRD-mediated mRNA stability complex
    ##                                                                        5.806526
    ##                                                                     MCM complex
    ##                                                                        5.779922
    ##                                                             Condensin I complex
    ##                                                                        4.568462
    ## Embryonic stem cell-specific SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex
    ##                                                                        4.256243

Of the 23 complexes that could be tested in this (unusually sparse) replicate, 13 were significant at an uncorrected, two-tailed p-value threshold of 0.05

## 0.3 Example 2: Interactome of HeLa cells

As a second example, we can reanalyze another dataset bundled with the PrInCE R package. This dataset consists of a subset of the data presented by Kristensen et al., 2012 (1), who applied SEC-PCP-SILAC to monitor the interactome of HeLa cell lysates, then mapped interactome rearrangements induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation. Three biological replicate experiments were performed, and in practice, all three replicates from each condition would be analyzed together. However, for the purposes of demonstrating the use of the PrInCE R package, we limit our analysis to the first replicate from the unstimulated condition.

We first load the data matrix and fitted Gaussians, provided with the PrInCE R package:

    data("kristensen")
    data("kristensen_gaussians")
    dim(kristensen)

    ## [1] 1875   48

    length(kristensen_gaussians)

    ## [1] 1117

The co-elution matrix contains quantifications for 1,875 proteins across 48 SEC fractions. Mixtures of Gaussians were fit to 1,117 of these. For the sake of time, we subset this matrix further to the first 500 proteins:

    kristensen <- kristensen[names(kristensen_gaussians), ]
    kristensen <- kristensen[seq_len(500), ]
    kristensen_gaussians <- kristensen_gaussians[rownames(kristensen)]

We also have to load our reference set of binary interactions or protein complexes, which in this case is derived from the Complex Portal human complexes.

    data("gold_standard")
    head(gold_standard, 5)

    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/B receptor complex`
    ## [1] "O95264" "P46098"
    ##
    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/C receptor complex`
    ## [1] "P46098" "Q8WXA8"
    ##
    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/D receptor complex`
    ## [1] "P46098" "Q70Z44"
    ##
    ## $`5-hydroxytryptamine-3A/E receptor complex`
    ## [1] "P46098" "A5X5Y0"
    ##
    ## $`6-phosphofructokinase, M2L2 heterotetramer`
    ## [1] "P08237" "P17858"

We can predict interactions in a single step using the main `PrInCE` function, here using a single model (instead of the default ensemble of ten) and five cross-validation folds (instead of the default of ten) for time:

    # set seed for reproducibility
    set.seed(0)
    # predict interactions
    interactions <- PrInCE(profiles = kristensen,
                           gold_standard = gold_standard,
                           gaussians = kristensen_gaussians,
                           models = 1,
                           cv_folds = 5)

Finally, we can subset our list of interactions to obtain set of high-confidence interactions for further analysis, using a relaxed precision cutoff of 50%.

    network <- threshold_precision(interactions, 0.5)
    nrow(network)

    ## [1] 1316

PrInCE predicts a total of 1,047 interactions at a precision of 50%.

## 0.4 Session info

    sessionInfo()

    ## R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05)
    ## Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
    ## Running under: Windows Server 2012 R2 x64 (build 9600)
    ##
    ## Matrix products: default
    ##
    ## locale:
    ## [1] LC_COLLATE=C
    ## [2] LC_CTYPE=English_United States.1252
    ## [3] LC_MONETARY=English_United States.1252
    ## [4] LC_NUMERIC=C
    ## [5] LC_TIME=English_United States.1252
    ##
    ## attached base packages:
    ## [1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base
    ##
    ## other attached packages:
    ## [1] PrInCE_1.2.0     BiocStyle_2.14.0
    ##
    ## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
    ##   [1] nlme_3.1-141          ProtGenerics_1.18.0   xts_0.11-2
    ##   [4] progress_1.2.2        doParallel_1.0.15     RColorBrewer_1.1-2
    ##   [7] MSnbase_2.12.0        tools_3.6.1           backports_1.1.5
    ##  [10] R6_2.4.0              affyio_1.56.0         rpart_4.1-15
    ##  [13] Hmisc_4.2-0           lazyeval_0.2.2        BiocGenerics_0.32.0
    ##  [16] colorspace_1.4-1      nnet_7.3-12           prettyunits_1.0.2
    ##  [19] tidyselect_0.2.5      gridExtra_2.3         curl_4.2
    ##  [22] compiler_3.6.1        preprocessCore_1.48.0 Biobase_2.46.0
    ##  [25] htmlTable_1.13.2      naivebayes_0.9.6      bookdown_0.14
    ##  [28] tseries_0.10-47       scales_1.0.0          checkmate_1.9.4
    ##  [31] DEoptimR_1.0-8        robustbase_0.93-5     lmtest_0.9-37
    ##  [34] fracdiff_1.4-2        quadprog_1.5-7        affy_1.64.0
    ##  [37] speedglm_0.3-2        stringr_1.4.0         digest_0.6.22
    ##  [40] foreign_0.8-72        rmarkdown_1.16        base64enc_0.1-3
    ##  [43] pkgconfig_2.0.3       htmltools_0.4.0       bibtex_0.4.2
    ##  [46] limma_3.42.0          TTR_0.23-5            htmlwidgets_1.5.1
    ##  [49] rlang_0.4.1           rstudioapi_0.10       quantmod_0.4-15
    ##  [52] impute_1.60.0         zoo_1.8-6             mzID_1.24.0
    ##  [55] BiocParallel_1.20.0   acepack_1.4.1         dplyr_0.8.3
    ##  [58] magrittr_1.5          Formula_1.2-3         MALDIquant_1.19.3
    ##  [61] Matrix_1.2-17         Rcpp_1.0.2            munsell_0.5.0
    ##  [64] S4Vectors_0.24.0      lifecycle_0.1.0       vsn_3.54.0
    ##  [67] stringi_1.4.3         forecast_8.9          yaml_2.2.0
    ##  [70] gbRd_0.4-11           MASS_7.3-51.4         zlibbioc_1.32.0
    ##  [73] plyr_1.8.4            grid_3.6.1            LiblineaR_2.10-8
    ##  [76] parallel_3.6.1        crayon_1.3.4          lattice_0.20-38
    ##  [79] splines_3.6.1         hms_0.5.1             mzR_2.20.0
    ##  [82] zeallot_0.1.0         knitr_1.25            pillar_1.4.2
    ##  [85] ranger_0.11.2         codetools_0.2-16      stats4_3.6.1
    ##  [88] urca_1.3-0            XML_3.98-1.20         glue_1.3.1
    ##  [91] evaluate_0.14         tester_0.1.7          latticeExtra_0.6-28
    ##  [94] pcaMethods_1.78.0     data.table_1.12.6     BiocManager_1.30.9
    ##  [97] vctrs_0.2.0           Rdpack_0.11-0         foreach_1.4.7
    ## [100] tidyr_1.0.0           gtable_0.3.0          purrr_0.3.3
    ## [103] assertthat_0.2.1      ggplot2_3.2.1         xfun_0.10
    ## [106] ncdf4_1.17            survival_2.44-1.1     timeDate_3043.102
    ## [109] tibble_2.1.3          iterators_1.0.12      IRanges_2.20.0
    ## [112] cluster_2.1.0

## References

1. Kristensen AR, Gsponer J, Foster LJ (2012) A high-throughput approach for measuring temporal changes in the interactome. Nature Methods 9(9):907–909.

2. Havugimana PC, et al. (2012) A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 150(5):1068–1081.

3. Kirkwood KJ, Ahmad Y, Larance M, Lamond AI (2013) Characterisation of native protein complexes and protein isoform variation using size-fractionation based quantitative proteomics. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics:mcp–M113.

4. Scott NE, et al. (2017) Interactome disassembly during apoptosis occurs independent of caspase cleavage. Molecular Systems Biology 13(1):906.

5. Skinnider MA, et al. (2018) An atlas of protein-protein interactions across mammalian tissues. bioRxiv:351247.

6. Skinnider MA, Stacey RG, Foster LJ (2018) Genomic data integration systematically biases interactome mapping. PLoS Computational Biology 14(10):e1006474.

7. Giurgiu M, et al. (2018) CORUM: The comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes—2019. Nucleic Acids Research.

8. Stacey RG, Skinnider MA, Chik JH, Foster LJ (2018) Context-specific interactions in literature-curated protein interaction databases. BMC Genomics 19(1):758.

9. Meldal BH, et al. (2018) Complex portal 2018: Extended content and enhanced visualization tools for macromolecular complexes. Nucleic Acids Research.

10. Riniker S, Fechner N, Landrum GA (2013) Heterogeneous classifier fusion for ligand-based virtual screening: Or, how decision making by committee can be a good thing. Journal of chemical information and modeling 53(11):2829–2836.

11. Tan CSH, et al. (2018) Thermal proximity coaggregation for system-wide profiling of protein complex dynamics in cells. Science 359(6380):1170–1177.