[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [oc] UART16550 core
Hi,
so if I understand correctly, there are two versions, one in Verilog that
was downloaded
from the opencores and one in VHDL that you wrote (perhaps opencores files
translated to
VHDL and than changed).
I don't know which ones to take for testing. I'm a verilog guy, not VHDL,
although I would
take the VHDL files if they contain less bugs than the ones in verilog.
Can you tell me if I'm correct about the differences.
In the meantime I'll start with the Verilog files.
Regards,
Igor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cores@opencores.org [mailto:owner-cores@opencores.org]On
> Behalf Of Carl van Schaik
> Sent: 06. avgust 2001 9:40
> To: cores@opencores.org
> Subject: Re: [oc] UART16550 core
>
>
> Hi Igor
>
> Maybe I should just send you the VHDL code. Add it to opencores?
> I will need to clean up my code a bit, add some comments and the GPL
> license first.
>
> I have not tested the UART fully and I'm sure there are still
> lots of errors
> in my VHDL.
> Someone will need to add the Modem control lines part, but that should
> not be too difficult.
>
> I did not change any of the verilog code for the UART16550 on opencores
> though. The verification module should work for both the VHDL and Verilog
> implementations?
>
> regards
> Carl
>
> > Hi, Carl,
> >
> > can you tell me what changes you did in the UART. I'm writing a
> verification
> > module.
> > I already started but I don't want to change things you tested
> already and
> > think are
> > OK.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Igor
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-cores@opencores.org [mailto:owner-cores@opencores.org]On
> > > Behalf Of Carl van Schaik
> > > Sent: 01. avgust 2001 7:29
> > > To: cores@opencores.org
> > > Subject: Re: [oc] UART16550 core
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I checked through the uart16550 code, looks like it needs a
> few changes.
> > > I have writen a VHDL 16550 uart that I was going to post up along with
> > > the Verilog version. It is currently working on my board so at
> > > least I know
> > > for sure that part of it works :-) I just need to implement modem
> control
> > > lines (or any volunteers?, should be easy) and get around to
> posting it.
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Carl van Schaik
> > > --
> > > Embedded Engineer
> > > OpenFuel Pty Ltd.
> > >
> > > > Hi, Guys and girls (if any).
> > > >
> > > > I would like to know if anybody tested the UART16550 core so far.
> > > > If any body implemented the core, run it on a board, etc...
> > > >
> > > > I want to help verifying the core.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Igor
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit
> > > http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit
> > http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit
> http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml