Hi Jeff, it is all about demand. Right now it looks like 32-bit insn length is most wanted, especially because of the coming 64-bit superscalar version of the OR1K. It is also true that prices of Flash and RAM are droping some 30% or more each year. But if there will be enough interest for 16-bit insn length, it could become a priority. regards, Damjan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Hanoch" <jeff@lowrance.com> To: <openrisc@opencores.org> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 7:54 PM Subject: [openrisc] OR1000 16 bit instruction set > Hi all, > > What is the status of the 16 bit instruction set or OR1K processors? Is > this no longer supported, or is this just on the back-burner until the > OR1200 is finished? > > I would like to consider using the OR1K processors in actual ASICs at my > company, but we really need a smaller, more compact opcode than the 32 > bit OR1200. The application would most likely be low-power, low-cost, > hand held products. Our products have limited FLASH memory, due to > cost, so the 16 bit instruction width would work much better for us. We > currently use the ARM7TDMI. > > Jeff > > > -- > To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml > -- To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml