Re: [openrisc] Function prologue and stack frame

[Marko Mlinar <markom@opencores.org>]

> > Right now I can't exactly remember the reasons for the changes that we
> > did (it was quite a while ago), but I would suggest that we stay with
> > the prologue that GCC produces. This means that it is necessary to
> > change the GDB and documentation. Your remarks will be useful in doing
> > that, but I don't know, when this will be finished. Maybe there are
> > people, that are willing to help, so work will be done faster.
>
> Well, I'm actually doing some GDB debugging myself (that's where my remarks
> came from). IMHO sources need a serious clean-up, and that's what I've been
> already working on.
>
> Is anybody acting as maintainer? I would like to know who is really
> responsible for this GDB port, so I can send my questions to the right box
> ;-). I think the amount of work that has to be done needs some kind of
> coordinator to make decissions that would change several portions of code,
> so people working on those different portions will make it the same way.
> Tell me what you think.
Well I am trying to be one. Also I am the wrote the code, but at that time 
or1k architecture was not fixed yet, so it may be a bit out of sync at some 
places like you already suggested.
Unfortunately I cannot help you with coding -- I just got my second baby and I 
am practically without free time ;) But I would really like to help you with 
gdb development and code comprehention.

> Merry Christmas for everybody!
Thanks!

Marko

--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml