[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [oc] Is OCIDEC (and other opencore-cores) ill-suited for FPGA's?

To: cores@opencores.org
Subject: Re: [oc] Is OCIDEC (and other opencore-cores) ill-suited for FPGA's?
From: Marko Mlinar <markom@opencores.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:35:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <3D727B1E.1050101@web.de>
References: <3D712A94.7050203@web.de> <200209011112.36481.richard@asics.ws> <3D727B1E.1050101@web.de>
Reply-To: cores@opencores.org
Sender: owner-cores@opencores.org
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1


> I hope, I haven't been impolite. Let me know, if aontother style of
> discussion is prefered here.
No, it is OK. Maybe this have be hard for Richard, but many designers can 
benefit from your advices. I find this very valuable.
And yes, cores@opencores.org is official mailing list for OCIDEC.

Marko

--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

References:
- Re: [oc] Is OCIDEC (and other opencore-cores) ill-suited for FPGA's?
  - From: Richard Herveille <richard@asics.ws>
- Re: [oc] Is OCIDEC (and other opencore-cores) ill-suited for FPGA's?
  - From: Volker Urban <volker.urban@web.de>

Prev by Date: Re: [oc] MP3 ENCODE AND DECODE SPEC
Next by Date: [oc] Syntax errors in OCIDEC -Details
Prev by thread: Re: [oc] Is OCIDEC (and other opencore-cores) ill-suited for FPGA's?
Next by thread: Re: [oc] Is OCIDEC (and other opencore-cores) ill-suited for FPGA's?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread