Re: mu TECH: a new uglified 'hexd'

From: Michele Andreoli (
Date: Wed Apr 26 2000 - 22:38:33 CEST

On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 07:10:22PM -0400, Alfie Costa nicely wrote:
> Problems or questions:
> 1) I don't know how to get 'gcc' to compile things small. With no switches,
> 'gcc' produces a 6K 'hexd' for the original version, yet mu's 'hexd' is only
> 3.6K. So the compiled version is not included.

Did you stripped the result object?

> 3) I can't think of many practical uses for decoding that '-x' output;
>it just
> seemed like a good idea.

A sort of uuencode?


I'd like to conclude with a positive statement, but I can't 
remember any. Would two negative ones do?       -- Woody Allen
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET