Re: mu TECH: a new uglified 'hexd'

From: Alfie Costa (
Date: Sat Apr 29 2000 - 00:19:54 CEST

On 26 Apr 2000, at 22:38, Michele Andreoli <> wrote:

> > 1) I don't know how to get 'gcc' to compile things small. With no
> > switches, 'gcc' produces a 6K 'hexd' for the original version, yet mu's
> > 'hexd' is only 3.6K. So the compiled version is not included.
> Did you stripped the result object?

No, maybe it's now time for me to read the gcc manual. On this topic, is it
better to send C programs as(?):

1) Source code only, because it's smallest, and ensures no virii.
2) Source and object code, to save labor.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 15:27:14 CET