[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [oc] GNU LGPL license

To: cores@opencores.org
Subject: Re: [oc] GNU LGPL license
From: John Dalton <john.dalton@bigfoot.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:13:50 +1000
In-Reply-To: <101981185301@gemini.hosting4u.net>; from richard@asics.ws on Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 19:05:35 +1000
References: <BasiliX-1.0.4b-10197256863cc7c776a582d@iza.mr2.si> <20020426113023.C561@bing.> <101981185301@gemini.hosting4u.net>
Reply-To: cores@opencores.org
Sender: owner-cores@opencores.org

Yes.  I fully agree with this point!

My mistake.  I meant to say the 'modified BSD'
license.  The one without the 'advertising clause'.

Regards
John
--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

References:
- [oc] GNU LGPL license
  - From: Damjan Lampret <lampret@opencores.org>
- Re: [oc] GNU LGPL license
  - From: John Dalton <john.dalton@bigfoot.com>
- Re: [oc] GNU LGPL license
  - From: Richard Herveille <richard@asics.ws>

Prev by Date: [oc] Want to get PathMill software
Next by Date: Rep:[oc] Floating point Core
Prev by thread: Re: [oc] GNU LGPL license
Next by thread: Re: [oc] GNU LGPL license
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread