Re: [openrisc] Function prologue and stack frame

[Simon Srot <simons@flextronics.si>]

Carlos S嫕chez de La Lama wrote:
> 
> Hallo everybody,
> 
> > Right now I can't exactly remember the reasons for the changes that we
> > did (it was quite a while ago), but I would suggest that we stay with
> > the prologue that GCC produces. This means that it is necessary to
> > change the GDB and documentation. Your remarks will be useful in doing
> > that, but I don't know, when this will be finished. Maybe there are
> > people, that are willing to help, so work will be done faster.
> 
> Well, I'm actually doing some GDB debugging myself (that's where my remarks
> came from). IMHO sources need a serious clean-up, and that's what I've been
> already working on.

You are probably right. 

> 
> Is anybody acting as maintainer? I would like to know who is really
> responsible for this GDB port, so I can send my questions to the right box
> ;-). I think the amount of work that has to be done needs some kind of
> coordinator to make decissions that would change several portions of code, so
> people working on those different portions will make it the same way. Tell me
> what you think.

It is great that you are willing to contribute. The maintainer for or1k
GDB port is Marko (markom@opencores.org). He is on vacation at the
moment, but he will be back next year :)
 
> 
> Merry Christmas for everybody!

Merry Christmas to you too.

> 
> Carlos
> --
> To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml