Re: [openrisc] Immediate value in l.nop instruction

["Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org>]

Yes the GNU binutils are out-dated if opencores cvs binutils are different
from gnu bintuils. Therefore opencores cvs binutils are more recent. However
opencores cvs binutils might also not work since they are development
version, so on a long run gnu binutils should be used.

regards,
Damjan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Sánchez de La Lama" <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>
To: <openrisc@opencores.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [openrisc] Immediate value in l.nop instruction


> Damian,
>
> I've modified GCC from opencores cvs to work with binutils from GNU. I
realize
> that binutils from opencores are the development version and should
therefore
> be taken as the newest version, but or32 support in GNU's official
binutils
> has just be added and files seem to have been written recently by you
(Damjan
> Lampret), so I'm not really sure about which is the good one. Do you mean
> or32 supoprt in oficial binutils is out-of-date?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Carlos Sanchez de La Lama <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > which version are you modfying, the one from opencores cvs or the one
from
> > gnu?
> >
> > Opencores cvs is the development version and once it is stable it moves
to
> > gnu folks, which means the gnu version needs to be updated in this case.
> >
> > regards,
> > Damjan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Carlos Sánchez de La Lama" <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>
> > To: <openrisc@opencores.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 6:57 PM
> > Subject: [openrisc] Immediate value in l.nop instruction
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > It looks like the current release of binutils (2.13.2.1) has support
for
> > > OpenRISC, so I switched to it instead of using snapshots from
Opencores
> >
> > CVS
> >
> > > server. But the assembler in that release will only accept a l.nop
> > > instruction if it comes with an immediate value as argument. And the
> >
> > ".half"
> >
> > > directive is no longer supported.
> > >
> > > To make GCC work with that version, small source changes are required.
> >
> > I've
> >
> > > done it, but I don't know what is better: shlould I attach a
patchfile,
> > > or should I upload changes to CVS server? Please tell me.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Carlos Sanchez de La Lama <csanchez@teisa.unican.es>
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit
> >
> > http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
> --
> To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
>

--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml