[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Language war, was Re: [oc] Verilog coding style ...

To: cores@opencores.org
Subject: Re: Language war, was Re: [oc] Verilog coding style ...
From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 12:42:14 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.53.0305212002410.1456@WS201.nsineltd.net>
Organization: Bali Automation Sdn Bhd
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0305201310460.23037-100000@nefertit.intranet> <200305221954.38310.nico@seul.org> <Pine.WNT.4.53.0305212002410.1456@WS201.nsineltd.net>
Reply-To: cores@opencores.org
Sender: owner-cores@opencores.org
User-Agent: KMail/1.5

On Wednesday 21 May 2003 11:20 am, Andras Ferencz wrote:
> About legacy: nobody will dare to question that PAL is better than NTSC.
> But, US is still NTSC, mainly because you cannot persuade people in US to
> change 200 million TV sets.

Bad argument. Those 200 million sets are changed every 5 years or so.
All TVs you buy here in Malaysia accepts NTSC, PAL and SECAM, and I think it 
is the case around the world by now. How about the transmission side, 
productions and so on? And we are all going HDTV anyway...

SO what is the HDTV equivalent of HDL?

Niclas
--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

References:
- Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in pointSHA1
  - From: Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz <mdalpoz@lsi.usp.br>
- Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in point SHA1
  - From: Nicolas Boulay <nico@seul.org>
- Language war, was Re: [oc] Verilog coding style ...
  - From: Andras Ferencz <opencores@ferencz.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in point SHA1
Next by Date: Re: [oc] Verilog vs VHDL vs Other
Prev by thread: Language war, was Re: [oc] Verilog coding style ...
Next by thread: [oc] i386 legally
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread