[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[oc] i386 legally

To: cores@opencores.org
Subject: [oc] i386 legally
From: paul <paulw@mmail.ath.cx>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 01:37:30 -0700
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0305201310460.23037-100000@nefertit.intranet> <3ECB1FF9.7060302@InformAsic.com> <200305221954.38310.nico@seul.org>
Reply-To: cores@opencores.org
Sender: owner-cores@opencores.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030203

What would be legal hurdles for making a i386 clone cpu?
any take?


--
To unsubscribe from cores mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [oc] i386 legally
  - From: John Dalton <john.dalton@bigfoot.com>

References:
- Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in pointSHA1
  - From: Marco Antonio Simon Dal Poz <mdalpoz@lsi.usp.br>
- Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in pointSHA1
  - From: Joachim Strömbergson<Joachim.Strombergson@InformAsic.com>
- Re: [oc] Verilog coding style for Open Cores-RTL - Case in point SHA1
  - From: Nicolas Boulay <nico@seul.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [oc] Verilog vs VHDL vs Other
Next by Date: Re: [oc] i386 legally
Prev by thread: Re: Language war, was Re: [oc] Verilog coding style ...
Next by thread: Re: [oc] i386 legally
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread