Re: [openrisc] New SDK for OpenRISC 1000

["Damjan Lampret" <lampret@opencores.org>]

And at the time the manual was changed to incorporate the differences known
between toolchain and the manual. However since not all differences (most
likely) were known at the time, Matjaz is now working to record all the
differences and the manual will be changed accordingly.

regards,
Damjan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Furman" <sfurman@rosum.com>
To: <openrisc@opencores.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [openrisc] New SDK for OpenRISC 1000


> Carlos Sánchez de La Lama wrote:
>
> >I think it
> >follows the architecture manual strictly now, but that means it's no
> >longer compatible with your GDB.
> >
> There was a discussion a few months back on this list noting that
> gcc/gdb did not follow the ABI in the architecture manual.  I believe
> the decision was to revise the architecture manual in the next release
> rather than to change gcc/gdb, so that any existing, hand-written
> assembly code would not need to be re-written.
>
> -Scott
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit
http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml
>

--
To unsubscribe from openrisc mailing list please visit http://www.opencores.org/mailinglists.shtml